Welcome:
You have chosen not to accept cookies on this site.
The reason you are on this page is of no fault of your own.
Being forced to allow a cookie or not is pretty pointless.
If I was to try and use a cookie to harm your machine, I would fail miserably, and be pretty dumb to think I even could.
A cookie is just a text file that sits in your Internet Cache, and if you clear your history when the browser closes, its gone, just as all the pages are.
If you know about Cookies, they have their own limitations, and can hold only text, no harmful characters.
The pages on a site can contain applications such as Java-script, and even that is harmless.
So which provides more risk, placing a cookie (text file), or asking you to click OK on something? I know which I prefer!
Unfortunately cookies are often used to keep pages secure and relevant stories in true context, which requires people to begin at the index page,
Therefore, you're here as this is the only page that doesn't require a cookie.
Internet crackdown raises fears for free speech in Britain ...
The death of Free Speech.
What's happening right here in Britain today, is that PCs are taking away peoples freedom?
PCs fail to see the difference between discussion, and total censorship.
Where do you draw the line between freedom of speech and offensive comments?
It’s an ongoing debate.
In the wake of the advent of social media the debate has got even louder.
People saying what they want gives the bosses of FaceBook,
Twitter and other social media sites a big headache.
But saying what you like is more acceptable in the United States than anywhere else, according to recent research.
The Pew Research Center polled 38 countries around the world in 2015.
They found that Americans are more tolerant of free speech than other nationalities.
They are also the most supportive of freedom of the press and the right to use the Internet without government censorship.
Critics say on-line harms white paper could lead to North Korean-style censorship.
However, the underlying factor is that once upon a time we had 'Great' freedom, and a Britain bearing the same title (Great).
North Korea has never had much freedom, but these days can be seen to be improving.
The UK on the other hand is being slowly suppressed, which makes people much worse off?
The PCs of this country are slowly taking over control?
NOTE, the above sentences finish with a question mark.
Even an opinion can get you into trouble, whereas a question is simply a question.
It could be surmised that particular law will also change soon?
